On 7/12/2013 11:46, Simon Cox wrote:
Ralph Hodgson wrote:
> I note your question on OWL-DL compliance. This is hard to do when
SKOS isin the mix.
Indeed. However, since QUDT only uses SKOS incidentally, it would be
better not to include SKOS at source. This would make
QUDT immediately usable in OWL-DL compliant applications. Currently
the onus is the wrong way round IMO. The SKOS axioms could still be
provided in a separate resource. However, I'm not really convinced
that SKOS match adds much in this context. Better to make it an
annotation property, such as rdfs:seeAlso.
Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Also, for OWL DL compliance just download a copy of QUDT and delete
thetriples that you don't want
Yes, that is what we have done for now. But we would prefer to refer
directly to the web-hosted resource. Clone and modify is not really in
the spirit of the semantic _web_ is it?
I would turn this around and claim that OWL DL, or at least some OWL DL
tools, are not in the spirit of the Semantic Web. In RDF it is possible
to merge together data from various sources, simply by collecting
triples into a single logical graph. If OWL DL tools then cannot handle
the results, then there is a problem with their own inflexibility. I
remember annotation property discussions from my Protege days seven
years ago, and I can hardly believe this is still a problem in 2013.
Which OWL DL tools are you using?
Thanks,
Holger
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary
Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live,
TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
