Option 3 will be inferred. Whether you want that inference persisted is up to you. FWIW I usually do make the ref:type explicit in this case. That way I know SPARQL query will always find it.
David Price > On 19 Oct 2015, at 19:58, Michel Bohms <[email protected]> wrote: > > When I define an Enumeration class X like > OneOf (value1, value2, value3) > > > what is then the best option for typing the items? > > 1-no type (already implicit by the oneof) > 2-of type owl:Thing > 3-of type X > > thx for advice, pros/cons > Michel > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group > "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary > Network (EVN), Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid > Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Suite Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
