The way I always thing about it is whether you compute the entailments in advance, or wait until run time. If the inferred triples will be used many times, then you do everyone a favour (and reduce total work) by computing them in advance and persisting them.
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 05:58:03 UTC+11, Michel Bohms wrote: > > When I define an Enumeration class X like > OneOf (value1, value2, value3) > > > what is then the best option for typing the items? > > 1-no type (already implicit by the oneof) > 2-of type owl:Thing > 3-of type X > > thx for advice, pros/cons > Michel > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), Reference Data Manager (RDM), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
