Re: [topbraid-users] customized seach function

Holger Knublauch Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:04:38 -0700

This is really weird. The serialization really should not make adifference. The only explanation I have would be that the owl: namespaceis somehow pointing at something else than we believe. If you can't getit to work, please send a minimal but complete set of RDF files for usto reproduce the problem. We are otherwise speculating on an incompletepicture.


Holger



On 24/03/2016 0:01, Shreelakshmi G.M wrote:


Thanks Irene I will try saving RDF to turtle and check.

On Mar 23, 2016 7:16 PM, "Irene Polikoff" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    OK, we will investigate.

    As an aside, you can save your RDF/XML file in Turtle by using
    Export > TopBraid Composer > Export/Merge/Convert RDF Graphs.

    Irene Polikoff


    From: "Shreelakshmi G.M" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Reply-To: <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 9:42 AM
    To: TopBraid Suite Users <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] customized seach function

    Yes, it opens. Actually, I created RDF/XML file in TBC itself. To
    test I created one .rdf file and one .ttl file with 2 classes and
    some instances. Then I tried using rdfs: Resource. It works with
    .ttl and not with .rdf.

    On Mar 23, 2016 6:47 PM, "Irene Polikoff" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        This sounds peculiar. By the time you are running your code,
        everything should already be de-serialised.

        Can you successfully open your RDF/XML file in TBC?

        Irene Polikoff


        From: "Shreelakshmi G.M" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Reply-To: <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 7:11 AM
        To: TopBraid Suite Users <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] customized seach function

        I could recognize the where the problem is. If I use .ttl
        serialization, I can use rdfs:Resource to list all resources
        but the same cannot be done using RDF/XML serialization.
        Is there any solution for this as I have already built an
        ontology in RDF/XML which I need to use.

        On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Shreelakshmi G.M
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            To make it simple, I just created a RDF file with single
            owl class in it, even that class is also not listed by
            rdfs:Resource argument.

            * <owl:Class rdf:ID="t">*
            *    <rdfs:label
            rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"*
            *    >t</rdfs:label>*
            *  </owl:Class>*
            *
            *
            This is the snippet for class in RDF file.

            On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Shreelakshmi G.M
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                @Irene Polikoff : yes with owl:Class I get all the
                classes and with owl:Thing I get all instances. I need
                both classes and instances in a single Autocomplete tag.

                @Holger Knublauch: yes all the instances have
                rdfs:label in the RDF file I am using and the file is
                bult using TBC itself.

                this is the snippet for one of the instance in the RDF
                file :

                *<prefixA:classA rdf:ID="instanceA">*
                *    <rdfs:label
                
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>instanceA</rdfs:label>*
                *</prefixA:classA>*

                On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Holger Knublauch
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    I have just tried that, using
                    swadoc:AutoCompleteExample:

                    <swa:AutoComplete arg:id="property" 
arg:type="rdfs:Resource"/>


                    and it appears to work fine for me - all resources
                    show up. Are you sure that all instances in your
                    data have rdfs:labels etc?

                    Holger


                    On 22/03/2016 1:11, Irene Polikoff wrote:

                    Have you tried rdfs:Resource as the arg:type?

                    Sent from my iPhone

                    On Mar 21, 2016, at 6:04 AM, Shreelakshmi G.M
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                    wrote:

                    Yes. i am embedding the SWA components in html,
                    and I am following the example that is there in
                    TBC.
                    In html page I have this *swa.queryGraphURI =
                    
"http://rdfex.org/withImports?uri=http://www.kanoe.org/ontology/myGraph";*
                    *
                    *

                    On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Holger
                    Knublauch <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        Have you tried rdfs:Resource? (This assumes
                        you are operating on a graph that has all
                        imports including the system triples - using
                        _withImports=true on the servlet or
                        ui:graphWithImports(?graph) on the graph
                        would do this.

                        Holger



                        On 21/03/2016 19:39, Shreelakshmi G.M wrote:

                        I would like to create customized form
                        where there would be search functionality
                        which is just a keyword search i.e it may
                        search either a class or a property or an
                        instance.
                        Autocomplete did not work as it can be
                        either for class or for instance. whatever
                        we give in arg:type that will be searched.
                        owl:Thing is for instances and owl:Class is
                        for class. Let me know what should be the
                        arg:type to search all these.

                        -Shreelakshmi