That ontology has existed for several years and is in use in various projects so yes it is connected to owl:Thing and to rdfs:Class. But it occurred to me that perhaps the superclass of fonm:Concept, which is prov:Entity, might not have a prefix in the current graph so I created one and that didn’t help. Then I reached out to the list. I should add that this doesn’t just happen with FONM. That was just the example that annoyed me at the time. It seems to happen when I have graphs open that have a large number of classes in them.
By the way, there are no errors or warnings when I load this graph and there are no missing references (this last being something that Steve Ray found that I wasn’t seeing in the TBC environment). Jack -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
