Hi Jack,
I checked the source code of the classes tree and it does have a maximum
number of children, which is the value that you can configure in TBC
Preferences > Max number of instances to display. Could you try
increasing that number to check if your classes then show up?
Holger
On 7/06/2018 23:08, Jack Hodges wrote:
That ontology has existed for several years and is in use in various projects
so yes it is connected to owl:Thing and to rdfs:Class. But it occurred to me
that perhaps the superclass of fonm:Concept, which is prov:Entity, might not
have a prefix in the current graph so I created one and that didn’t help. Then
I reached out to the list. I should add that this doesn’t just happen with
FONM. That was just the example that annoyed me at the time. It seems to happen
when I have graphs open that have a large number of classes in them.
By the way, there are no errors or warnings when I load this graph and there
are no missing references (this last being something that Steve Ray found that
I wasn’t seeing in the TBC environment).
Jack
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
