Hi, I have a taxonomy called "Security Classification" that contains five classification levels in a hierarchy modeled using skos:broader. This was manually created in an EDG Taxonomy as the "Security Classification Concept Scheme".
I have added a property/property shape to edg:InformationAsset using a new property :securityClassification. I'm struggling with how to assert that all values of the property :securityClassification must be a member of the Security Classification Concept Scheme. The simple thing to do would be to also create a Security Classification class and make all concepts instances of the class, leaving SKOS as the vocabulary by which I structure the terms. Then sh:class can be used to define the values. This appears to be how the Geography Taxonomy and Geo Ontology work together. Doing so also feels redundant as I can see needing to make an ontology that mirrors my Concept Schemes for all cases where I need to restrict values to a specific Concept Scheme. Is there a recommended design pattern for using concept schemes as the values for a property shape? I'm looking for a solution that EDG will support, i.e. limit the values the user can select on a form to the specific Concept Scheme members. Thanks in advance for your assistance, Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CAF0Wbn%2B0qg_u4qbJsC2bmRLbG2sFUgCeHKMJ32x2v7M3hpEkfw%40mail.gmail.com.
