On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Karsten Loesing <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > I talked to Roger on IRC, and here's why this proposal may indeed be > overkill: > > As of January 2013, there is only a single version 3 directory authority > left that serves version 2 statuses: dizum. moria1 and tor26 have been > rejecting version 2 requests for a long time, and it's mostly an > oversight that dizum still serves them. The other six authorities have > never generated version 2 statuses for others to be used as pre-voting > opinions. So, it's basically not true that version 2 statuses are > required for the version 3 protocol to work properly. > > Here's a possible way to move this forward. > > - Please review and merge my prop147tweaks branch that contains tweaks > from our discussion above, regardless of whether this proposal will be > implemented or not.
Done. > - I'm going to run a quick analysis of archived vote documents to see > how much authorities would have benefited from the others' votes before > generating their own votes. > > - I'm going to ask Alex to disable version 2 statuses on dizum using > DisableV2DirectoryInfo_ 1 to see what that does to the network. We > should probably finish the 2048 bits RSA keys upgrade first before > changing yet another variable. Soynds good. > - If there's no convincing argument to implement opinion documents, we > close this proposal as rejected. Great. > What do you think? Sounds good. _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
