On 1/16/14 10:03 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Karsten Loesing <[email protected]> > wrote: > [...] >> I talked to Roger on IRC, and here's why this proposal may indeed be >> overkill: >> >> As of January 2013, there is only a single version 3 directory authority >> left that serves version 2 statuses: dizum. moria1 and tor26 have been >> rejecting version 2 requests for a long time, and it's mostly an >> oversight that dizum still serves them. The other six authorities have >> never generated version 2 statuses for others to be used as pre-voting >> opinions. So, it's basically not true that version 2 statuses are >> required for the version 3 protocol to work properly. >> >> Here's a possible way to move this forward. >> >> - Please review and merge my prop147tweaks branch that contains tweaks >> from our discussion above, regardless of whether this proposal will be >> implemented or not. > > Done. > >> - I'm going to run a quick analysis of archived vote documents to see >> how much authorities would have benefited from the others' votes before >> generating their own votes. >> >> - I'm going to ask Alex to disable version 2 statuses on dizum using >> DisableV2DirectoryInfo_ 1 to see what that does to the network. We >> should probably finish the 2048 bits RSA keys upgrade first before >> changing yet another variable. > > Soynds good.
Okay, will post here how that went. Might take a week or maybe longer, depending on how far the 2048 bits RSA keys upgrade is. All the best, Karsten >> - If there's no convincing argument to implement opinion documents, we >> close this proposal as rejected. > > Great. > >> What do you think? > > Sounds good. > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev > . > _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
