On 7/21/15, Nick Mathewson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yawning's mail below reminds me: I am considering removing the C > implementation of tor-fw-helper from the tor distribution, and recommending > Yawning's pure-Go implementation instead. But before I do this, I'd like > to get some sense of whether folks are shipping tor-fw-helper today, or > using it in practice.
Does the pure-Go implementation support NAT-PMP or just UPnP? I still use tor-fw-helper when I hand compile Tor on obscure systems. Generally this means a Novena board when I need a newer version of Tor than is already packaged. Also - does this mean that after many many years... that this new version of tor-fw-helper be enabled by default at build time? Pretty please? :-) All the best, Jake _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
