We'll remove it. -V
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 at 05:20 Tom van der Woerdt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 13 Sep 2015, at 22:09, teor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13 Sep 2015, at 18:18, Sean Saito <[email protected]> wrote: > > >"No Self-Referencing Relays" > > >I'm not sure what exactly you mean by that but I assume it is a MyFamily > > >config where a relay includes his own fingerprint. Why does that hurt? > > >The unnecessary descriptor space/bw? > > > > This is something Virgil wanted because he thought self-connections were > ugly. If the > > penalizing of self-connections is found to be uglier than the > self-connections themselves, we're > > both fine with removing it. > > > Can this be downgraded to an informational message? (or eliminated > entirely?) > > Penalties can be quite discouraging, particularly for minor configuration > variants. > > Tim > > > I agree, and this one in particular is important to some operators: by > allowing a relay to specify itself in the family, one can just have a > single configuration file for all relays in a family. > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev >
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
