On 4/13/18 12:26, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> (ask Pastly for access)
> Hi Matt, why is this repo read restricted? I was idly curious to see
> the code of sbws and was surprised it's effectively closed source.
While I didn't necessarily work on sbws while at my place of work, I
couldn't rationalize that it is unrelated to my day job. Thus I need to
get permission from my employer in order to release sbws.
I've already submitted that paperwork and expect to get it back in about
It is licensed under CC0 and is therefore in the public domain (or will
be... depending on how you want to interpret the situation).
Fun side note: little-t-tor itself had to go through the same process.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
tor-dev mailing list