On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Moritz Bartl <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24.11.2012 12:46, tagnaq wrote: >>> Shouldn't some exit relays (funded or not) be deployed to use an >>> exit IP that is different from it's advertised exit IP in order to >>> prevent a simplistic form of blocking based on scraping the >>> descriptor set? > > I don't think it's a good idea. People are always thankful when I can > point them to the bulk exit list and torDNSel. I point out that Tor has > a lot of users and not all of them are bad, and urge for a temporary > block. Most admins seem to follow that advice.
But in the light of "an IP address is not identity" -- is it reasonable to block every user of an IP because one person (or bot) is up to no good? Why do people insist on "stopping" problem behavior at the network layer? --Aaron > > https://check.torproject.org/cgi-bin/TorBulkExitList.py > https://www.torproject.org/projects/tordnsel.html.en > > -- > Moritz Bartl > https://www.torservers.net/ > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
