On Monday, March 9, 2015 3:33pm, "grarpamp" <[email protected]> said:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Markus Hitter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder: >>> Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g. >>> gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a >>> big step forward in curbing spam. This would allow the exit >>> operation to refuse traffic to the webmail service while stilling >>> allowing access to the parent presence. >> >> Good point! > > Two censors high five-ing themselves over ways to ban entire > peoples freedom to communicate using webmail. Amazing. > Yet you do not call your ISP demanding they block your webmail > for the same and greater spam reason. I hear internets is bad, you > should ban it too. Please die from clue bat first. I my mind such a capability would be optional, like opening POP3 and IMAP ports are today. Thus *your* relay could support all services while someone with a more timid ISP could still run an exit node, albeit an exit node that is less useful than yours. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
