> On 8 Nov. 2016, at 23:15, Markus Koch <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/B771AA877687F88E6F1CA5354756DF6C8A7B6B24 > > the same, others are perfectly fine. no clue why :/
(This conversation might make more sense if you replied below the original email, which is known as bottom-posting.) >> Is there a way to identify the cause of this drop? > > The bandwidth authorities measured your relay as being able to handle > approximately 9960 KByte/s (High 17500, Low 5470, Low-Median 9960.) > (large page) https://consensus-health.torproject.org/consensus-health-2016-11-08-11-00.html#B771AA877687F88E6F1CA5354756DF6C8A7B6B24 > Your relay's observed bandwidth is also 12.37 MByte/s > (hover over the > bandwidth heading in atlas for these details), so its consensus weight > will be limited to approximately ~12667 > (KByte/s) anyway. > > If you want to increase these measurements, try increasing the actual traffic your relay can handle. >> Is there anyone else in same situation? > > The system is functioning as designed: your relay's observed maximum > bandwidth is approximately the same as > the bandwidth measured by the bandwidth > authorities. > > If you want to fix this, add more bandwidth. T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
