Thanks for the link to consensus-health, based data available: 05/11 17:00 longclaw=4540 gabelmoo=4170 moria1=4410 faravahar=2520 => cons: 4170
05/11 18:00 longclaw=4550 gabelmoo=*2170* moria1=4410 faravahar=2520 => cons: *2520* So that explains the drop. Seb On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 at 13:40 teor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8 Nov. 2016, at 23:32, r1610091651 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The previous drops, i know why they happened (related to server > unavailability) so I know the cause. For 5th however I have no clue. > > As far as I can tell, the relay is accurately measured. > > Sometimes, this means that you get a lower measurement than you might have > had before. > > Accurate bandwidth measurements are a good thing for tor users, even if the > changes in the measurement are sometimes (temporarily) disappointing to > relay > operators. > > If you want to improve the measurements, try adding more bandwidth. > For your relay, this means increasing BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst. > > T > > -- > Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) > > teor2345 at gmail dot com > PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B > ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n > xmpp: teor at torproject dot org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
