Rana I don't think there's more anyone can do here. I think people here have done a good job explaining _why_ you see what you see.
If you would like to see something change, it would be a good idea to go to https://trac.torproject.org, create an account (or use the cypherpunks one), and open a ticket stating facts such as - where you saw that the Tor Project saying they want relays with dynamic IPs - your reasoning for why teor's 4 bullet points about "advantages to resetting when a relay's IP address changes" are not valid If the Tor Project really said they want relays with dynamic IPs, maybe the wording needs to be modified. I imagine, for instance, they might have said dynamic IPs are good for bridges. In any case, your ticket will be best received if doesn't have a demanding/entitled/accusatory tone and has concrete ideas for what should be done. Thank you for running a relay and please do not be discouraged by numbers. Best Matt On 12/04/2016 01:46 PM, Rana wrote: > Paul, you may be a very, very smart dude who needs no clarifications and I > may be a passive aggressive liberal fascist but you are totally wrong - I > have NO idea what "submit a patch" means in whatever jargon you are using. > Submit what? To whom? Where? In what form? > > -----Original Message----- > From: tor-relays [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of pa011 > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 8:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP > > Rana, I don’t think ""submit a patch" needs any clarification. > > Maybe you are a little bit to aggressive in your wording :-) ? > > I do have a dynamic IP as well on one relay and do know that frustration. > > Relax > > Paul > > > Am 04.12.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Rana: >> Please clarify what you mean by "submit a patch". >> >> I am not one of Tor technical contributors, nor do I presume capability of >> being one. I can only report my findings as a relay operator. Which I have >> already done here, in full detail. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: tor-relays [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Sebastian Niehaus >> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 7:05 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with >> dynamic IP >> >> Am 04.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Rana: >> >>> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it >>> should say so and I would stop wasting my time. Otherwise, Tor should >>> fix what's broken. >> >> Please submit a patch. >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Crying about what tor shold do to please you seems not very productive. >> >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
