On 2018-02-12 11:39, nusenu wrote: > Once the decision has been made to publish contactInfo, people with > access to the current contactInfo (bridgeDB, isis?) should sent current > bridge operators > a pre-notice about the upcoming change so they have a chance to react to it. > > I assume you will not implement this change retroactively (only contactInfo > going forward > from a given date will be published but not from past descriptors).
Fine question. I guess there's not much value in having contact information for bridges running in the past, but only for current bridges. We could pick a date like March 1 or April 1 and start including contact information in descriptors published after that date. Then it also makes sense to reach out to bridge operators with such an announcement. > We could also to reach out to the IMDEA researcher that wrote the bridge paper > "Dissecting Tor Bridges: a Security Evaluation of > Their Private and Public Infrastructures" > as they might have some additional ideas why this could be a bad idea? Good idea, I'll do that now. (Again, adding more context for this list, this is different research group than the one disclosing a list of bridge IP addresses a couple month ago.) All the best, Karsten
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays