> On 2 May 2018, at 19:20, Iain Learmonth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/05/18 09:50, teor wrote: >> Being in the consensus is called "Running", but what it actually means is >> that a majority of directory authorities found your relay reachable. >> >> So perhaps we could use: >> * uptime for the amount of time since the tor process started >> * reachable time for the amount of time the relay has been online and >> available to clients > > I will raise this issue at the next Metrics team meeting on Thursday. > I'm not sure how many clients we would break if we rename the uptime > documents, but maybe it's the right thing to do in the long run.
I think you should prioritise renaming things in relay search and the metrics website. Renaming backends isn't as high a priority: updating the specification is much cheaper, and it achieves a similar outcome. T _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
