On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Anton Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aaron Gibson: > > On 2015-02-25 14:22, Anton Nesterov wrote: > >> "11. If government inspection find Internet resources or anonymity tools > >> (proxy servers, anonymous networks like Tor, and so on), which can be > >> used to get access for Internet resources with limited access, they > >> should add identifier of that Internet resources or anonymity tools to > >> the list of limited access." > >> > >> http://pravo.by/main.aspx?guid=12551&p0=T21503059&p1=1&p5=0 text > >> (Russian) > > > > Is there any mention of penalties for circumventing the blocks? > > No, only for ISPs if they refuse to block. > > Also, news report in English > https://meduza.io/en/news/2015/02/25/belarus-bans-tor > "According to an announcement by the nation’s Communications Ministry, the authorities intend to block access to any anonymizers that allow Internet users to reach online resources banned inside Belarus." That seems ambiguous, online resources physically inside the country or online resources that could be anywhere but are banned from being accessed inside the country? Do other countries ban all exit nodes? -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
