On 30.09.10 05:24, Thomas Fischer wrote: > I would be in favour of dropping the need for "extends BaseObject".
I don't think this is meant to be necessary. The objects only must implement Persistent. The schema supports the "baseClass" and "basePeer" attributes to achieve this. However, I actually *do* remember that the replacement failed because of some braindead assumption in BasePeer. At least I gave up when I tried it. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
