Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 30.09.10 05:24, Thomas Fischer wrote: > > I would be in favour of dropping the need for "extends BaseObject". > > I don't think this is meant to be necessary. The objects only must > implement Persistent. The schema supports the "baseClass" and "basePeer" > attributes to achieve this. However, I actually *do* remember that the > replacement failed because of some braindead assumption in BasePeer. At > least I gave up when I tried it.
Ok I created a jira issue for dropping this requirement: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-147 I'd be interested in views whether we should retain BaseObject at all. Please comment in jira. Thanks, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
