Haven't tried this but I imagine that from Torque's perspective (JDBC + Village), RAW and LONG RAW are handled equivalently. In both cases, PreparedStatement.setBytes and ResultSet.setBytes should take/return a byte[]. The distinction between the two may only be important in the database itself.
-- Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Oracle RAW Datatype > I have an existing Oracle 9i table that has several RAW columns > defined. I noticed that Torque converts 'BINARY' types declared in the > schema file to 'LONG RAW'. This doesn't work for me because the RAW > columns have indexes on them. Before I simply try reading the table > with what Torque generates, has anyone faced this issue before? Perhaps > Torque will read the columns declared as RAW without a problem? > > Thanks. > > -- > "All motion is not progress, and all movement is not forward" (anon) > Key ID: F0533BB6 > Finger Print: 7F07 D9CD 266F 29D4 3616 164D F055 6E4C F053 3BB6 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
