Thank you Bill! I'm trying it now...I hope you're right! -robert.
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 06:32, Bill Schneider wrote: > Haven't tried this but I imagine that from Torque's perspective (JDBC + > Village), RAW and LONG RAW are handled equivalently. In both cases, > PreparedStatement.setBytes and ResultSet.setBytes should take/return a > byte[]. The distinction between the two may only be important in the > database itself. > > -- Bill > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:04 AM > Subject: Oracle RAW Datatype > > > > I have an existing Oracle 9i table that has several RAW columns > > defined. I noticed that Torque converts 'BINARY' types declared in the > > schema file to 'LONG RAW'. This doesn't work for me because the RAW > > columns have indexes on them. Before I simply try reading the table > > with what Torque generates, has anyone faced this issue before? Perhaps > > Torque will read the columns declared as RAW without a problem? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > "All motion is not progress, and all movement is not forward" (anon) > > Key ID: F0533BB6 > > Finger Print: 7F07 D9CD 266F 29D4 3616 164D F055 6E4C F053 3BB6 > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "All motion is not progress, and all movement is not forward" (anon) Key ID: F0533BB6 Finger Print: 7F07 D9CD 266F 29D4 3616 164D F055 6E4C F053 3BB6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
