-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 31 March 2003 19:21, Steve Lukshides wrote: > Interesting. I asked the question below last week and received only one > reply. Would anyone else care to comment or are we all in the > investigatory phase?
probably most users don't dare to comment in a way that seems authorative about a software package they did not test extensively. (at least, that's my motivation that keeps me from answering such questions) but for what it's worth, i run a small website with turbine, which uses torque as a persistence layer, and i never had any stability issues. speed is good, but the machine the site is running on is not very high-end, and the load is small. and the compulsory adivsory: your mileage may vary :) seriously, probably you set up a testcase and report back on the list? i'd be interested, but neither have the time nor the resources to set up some tests. rick - -- |- | peter riegersperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |- | subnet | platform for media art and experimental technologies |- | http://www.subnet.at/ |- | muehlbacherhofweg 5 // 5020 salzburg // austria |- | fon/fax +43/662/842 897 |- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+iHthIMP39JYOy9IRAn5BAKDDpJXlJMsBJTl90DvBfkKViEhdVwCg3NMR dibkJHlun9b+oWu0XM6buhA= =1dAs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
