This is interesting. I am especially interested in the reason for not going with EJB's. I am doing a little project so I do not have any experiences with performace issues. I am still developing so I cannot comment on long time stability. Only I can say is that it never failed me untill now.
I did not use EJB's for two reasons: - I have no experience with it and did not have the time in this project to really learn them - I asked around a lot and came to the conclusion that it is quite a heavy environment which has performance problems if not tuned by someone with considerable experience. I could not find a reason to use EJB's in my small project. Did anyone else consider EJB's and what were their reasons to use Torque? Humberto Hernandez Torres wrote: > > We use Turbine/Torque in many projects since two years ago. We haven't had > any scalability problems. But in some cases we have had to cache results to > increase performance. Other issues that we had, were resolved in the list or > looking at the source code. Most of the issues we had were plataform > related. E.g. There were some problems with MS-SQL that have already been > solved and the same thing happened with DB2. > -- > > Humberto > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: peter riegersperger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:31 AM > > To: Turbine Torque Users List > > Subject: Re: Torque project references, stability, reliability > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Monday 31 March 2003 19:21, Steve Lukshides wrote: > > > Interesting. I asked the question below last week and > > received only one > > > reply. Would anyone else care to comment or are we all in the > > > investigatory phase? > > > > probably most users don't dare to comment in a way that seems > > authorative > > about a software package they did not test extensively. (at > > least, that's my > > motivation that keeps me from answering such questions) > > > > but for what it's worth, i run a small website with turbine, > > which uses torque > > as a persistence layer, and i never had any stability issues. > > speed is good, > > but the machine the site is running on is not very high-end, > > and the load is > > small. > > > > and the compulsory adivsory: your mileage may vary :) > > > > seriously, probably you set up a testcase and report back on > > the list? i'd be > > interested, but neither have the time nor the resources to > > set up some tests. > > > > rick > > > > > > - -- > > |- > > | peter riegersperger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > |- > > | subnet > > | platform for media art and experimental technologies > > |- > > | http://www.subnet.at/ > > |- > > | muehlbacherhofweg 5 // 5020 salzburg // austria > > |- > > | fon/fax +43/662/842 897 > > |- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQE+iHthIMP39JYOy9IRAn5BAKDDpJXlJMsBJTl90DvBfkKViEhdVwCg3NMR > > dibkJHlun9b+oWu0XM6buhA= > > =1dAs > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
