Sarav,
I would suggest you send a brief description of the problems your patches address to the village-dev mailing list and see if you get a response. There has been no activity on village for a very long time, but if there are legitimate problems that need to be addressed you will hopefully get a response.
Scott
-- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au
Saravana Krishnan Kannan wrote:
Hi,
I haven't tried to get it integrated with the main Village, but I'm definitely willing to lend them the code if they would put it along with the main Village code. As of now my patch has a lot of Oracle specific code, but that can simply set up village to call my code only if the Metadata says the connection is an Oracle connection.
-Sarav
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Torque Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:27:31 +1000 Subject: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]
I'm half way through applying the patch below to Torque 3.1.1 and HEAD. I don't use Oracle so I cannot if this is going to help or make things worse.
Can all you Oracle users out there please let me know your opinion?
I'm aiming to get a 3.1.1 release of torque out fairly soon and I would appreciate your feedback.
BTW: I am including a reference to your Sarav's patched Village 2.0 code in the Oracle HOWTO - I hope this is okay. Shrav: Have you made any attempts at getting your changes committed to back to Village?
Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
