Yes, thats the mail I was referring to. -Sarav
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Apache Torque Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:12:15 +1000 Subject: Re: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle] Was the message you are referring to this one? http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=4216 Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au Saravana Krishnan Kannan wrote: >Hi Scott, > > I remember very well that the Date vs Timestamp had something to do with the > templates that generate code for the Date type field. Someone sent a well explained > mail about it to the list and it made a lot of sense. Hope that's the patch you are > applying. Thanks for your work. > >-Sarav > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Torque Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:27:31 +1000 >Subject: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle] > >I'm half way through applying the patch below to Torque 3.1.1 and HEAD. >I don't use Oracle so I cannot if this is going to help or make things >worse. > >Can all you Oracle users out there please let me know your opinion? > >I'm aiming to get a 3.1.1 release of torque out fairly soon and I would >appreciate your feedback. > >BTW: I am including a reference to your Sarav's patched Village 2.0 code >in the Oracle HOWTO - I hope this is okay. Shrav: Have you made any >attempts at getting your changes committed to back to Village? > >Scott > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
