On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:40 PM, TK Soh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Peer Sommerlund > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> 2008/7/22 TK Soh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Peer Sommerlund >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > The about message text contains both the GPL, and instructions on "How >>> > to >>> > Apply These Terms to Your New Programs". Is the latter part of the >>> > license >>> > text? >>> >>> Are you referring to the License window? >> >> Yes I am. >> >>> >>> IIRC, it was copied as it from Mercurial's source tree. >> >> Ok - I'm not an expert in jura - it just looked strange. > > It appears to come from original license text, so I am so sure if it's > good to take it out: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt > > Though it probably doesn't hurt to take. Anyone think otherwise?
Since you're required to put derivative work under the GPL as well, maybe the GPL people want this part to come with the license so you know what to do. -parren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
