On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Douglas Philips <[email protected]> wrote: > On or about 2008 Dec 12, at 9:25 PM, TK Soh indited: > >> The next TortoiseHg release will probably happen fairly soon, as the >> primarily goal is to link against Mercurial 1.1. We can decide later >> when these new features are mature for release. There's no need to >> rush ;-) > > From what I've seen on the mercurial lists, 1.1 has some problems and > it seems that a number of regressions which even Matt wants to see > addressed quickly, so perhaps TortoiseHg release should wait for 1.1.1 > or whatever they call it. > As you say, there is no need to rush... > > Just my two cents, as they say,
We will be waiting for 1.1.1 indeed. In fact, I was advised a few days ago by one of the Mercurial developers to hold 0.6 till Mercurial 1.1.1 is released. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
