On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Peer Sommerlund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/1/15 Abdul Halim <[email protected]> >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Douglas Philips <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 2009 Jan 14, at 12:57 AM, TK Soh wrote: >> >>> We shall revisit the issue when 0.6 is out. But bear in mind that >> >>> sticky options may still be a difficult topic. >> >> >> >> Yes, I thought we were talking post 0.6 on that... >> >> >> >> BTW: When 0.5 came out, there were issues with upgrading over 0.4.x >> >> that required the old version to be uninstalled first. >> >> Some of my team didn't upgrade because of the uninstall. Is 0.6 going >> >> to install over 0.4.x/0.5 or will they have to be uninstalled first? >> > >> > If you are still on 0.4.x, then you will need to uninstall first. I >> > will see if we can overcome this before releasing 0.6. >> >> This is strange, that only Doug is having this problem.. I don't need >> to uninstall 0.4. >> The difference is that I build my own installer. >> >> Any feedback from other tortoisehg windows users? > > This is a real problem, triggered by the introduction of TortoiseOverlays > which changed some keys in registry for COM servers. There were a number of > mails on the mail list at the introduction of 0.5. > The problem materialise if you go from pre 0.5 to 0.5 or newer. > The solution is simple: The installer should call the uninstaller as the > first step if it detects an installed THG.
I am open for patches. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
