On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:02 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Peer Sommerlund > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> 2009/1/15 TK Soh <[email protected]> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Peer Sommerlund >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > The solution is simple: The installer should call the uninstaller as the >>> > first step if it detects an installed THG. >>> >>> I am open for patches. >> >> I have some trouble with my patchbomb, so attached is a patch file. >> I'm not quite satisfied with the workflow, so maybe somebody can come up >> with a better way to do it. > > I haven't really tested it, but here's some quick thought. > > I also feel that there are too many steps involved. First, I think we > should just remove the previous installation without asking for > permission, since there's not reason to keep the old one around. > > The other problem I can see is that the uninstaller [of the previous > installation] will prompt for a reboot, and this can be potentially > confusing. Though I don't have a solution to this. Any quick idea?
BTW, I'm going to start building the installer and release 0.6 either later today or tomorrow morning. I hope we can find a workaround on the reboot issue by then. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
