On 27-03-2010 20:20, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: > The show stopper is, if we have to commit ourselves to have all > component GUIDs the same over time.
Yes... that does has its own problems, for sure. Also, after thinking some more about, we can always make the GUIDs persitant again if we ever in future should decide to upgrade differently. > The only thing we need about component GUID's is, that the GUID's in the > source code and the GUID's in the installer are the same for any > specific version X. Yes, for major upgrades. We agree on this. > In particular, we do *have* to take a different product id for every > built msi. Upgrading/downgrading files won't work correctly otherwise. Yes, I suppose that's what defines major upgrades vs. minor. Ok, I suggest we halt this thread as we don't really disagree about anything in it. ..and the other one soon as well, I hope. /Sune ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
