Hi folks,

I've pushed a number of bug fixes for the commit tool to crew.  If you
were waiting to try out the new record/selection features, now would be
a good time to take a first or second look.

The 'hide rejected chunks' toggle is gone, since it seemed to confuse
people and was broken on Windows anyway.  Strikethrough is also no
longer used on rejected hunks.  Instead, the hunk background is darkened
and the text is scaled down to 60% size.  Let me know what you think
about these changes.  Scaled too far, not enough?

Partially selected files are now visually noticeable in two ways.  The
'inconsistent' state in the file list now works correctly, on Windows
the box is filled in like in a multiple choice exam.  Also, the file
diff header has the tag '** Partial **' added to it.  Let me know what
you think about this as well (is the text tag in the right place?)

I have two TODOs yet before the 0.7 feature freeze (Feb 15th).

1) show diffs from copies/renames, allow their change selection
2) move shelve feature into it's own dialog, so the status dialog will
have three modes: commit, shelve, status

I'm hoping for feedback as well about how to visualize a file's diffs
when it is entirely unselected.  Should they be removed from the diff
list, or modified somehow?

Should we put a comment above the diff list telling the user to 'toggle
hunks to exclude them from commit'?

--
Steve


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss

Reply via email to