On 2009 Feb 26, at 11:09 AM, Steve Borho wrote:
> Have you tried the latest nightly build?  Did it improve app startup
> times at all?  If not, I'll probably leave those demandimport changes
> out of the 0.7 release just to be extra safe.

I've been using 090222, but was paying attention to other aspects of  
operation.
Will try noticing the timing tomorrow.

> I'm open to an uber app that welds dirstate maintenance, push/pull,
> and the history browser, if it's done well.

Agreed!

> At this point, it's all about priorities.  Going into the 0.8 July
> release, my main priority still is growing the user base.  That means
> useability, documentation, translations, ports (Win64, MacOSX), and
> binary packages for non windows platforms.

Understood. That makes sense.
Performance is oft characterized as usability, but I think in this case
performance is good enough that those other things are more important.

> After 0.8, most everything is up in the air.  I think we're nearing
> feature completeness for a 1.0 type release.  There's no big gaping
> holes in the coverage as far as I can tell.

:)

Thank you to everyone working on this, without THg I would not be able  
to use Mercurial at work.

--Doug


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss

Reply via email to