On 25.07.2009 02:07, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: > On 24.07.2009 17:58, Steve Borho wrote: >> Now that 0.8.1 is out the door, it's time to concentrate on 0.9. >> >> The first large steps will be happening soon. I am going to apply >> names to the two existing lines of development. The 0.8 line of >> development, which is present in both the stable and crew >> repositories, will be given a branch name of '0.8'. The 0.9 line of >> development, which is only present on the crew repository, will be >> given a branch name of '0.9'. > > Another rough idea to check: > > What about introducing just the branch name "stable"? > > The default branch could take over what's currently in crew repo. > > The "stable" branch could take over what's currently in stable repo. > > This would save us from a proliferation of branch names.
My "stable" branch name approach has the nice benefit of not having a problem with name-clashing with release tags. That is, there would be no need to resort to using 0.n.0 as tag for initial feature releases. Furthermore, not having similar names as tags *and* branch names at the same time helps to keep general confusion low. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
