2009/7/26 Steve Borho <st...@borho.org> > I'm leaning towards maintaining just a stable branch as it's most > similar to our existing work flows. > > But I would like to hear from the translation team, especially Peer, > about how this affects their efforts. Would named release branches > (0.9, etc) be any easier to manage, or is a single stable branch the > best approach for launchpad as well.
The translation effort will work on two branches: The most recent stable and the unstable (crew). I guess it makes most sense for translators to work primarily on the most recent stable, since strings does not change. During the release countdown we turn unstable into stable and "begin" translation effort for the comming release. With this approach there is no difference between last stable = stable, unstable = crew and last stable = 0.8.x, unstable = default There are some minor differences between creating a new branch or merging crew to stable, but this is not significant. Note that I have set up a 0.8 branch on launchpad. This is my personal preference, but if you decide to use a stable/ustable branch policy I will change the launchpad branches to reflect that. Regards, Peer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list Tortoisehg-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
