On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 6:39:11 AM UTC+1, Paul P. wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for your response. More or less, that is what I was expecting - > just wasn't sure if there was a way I had missed. > > Regarding TSVN not being able to determine "branches" and offer to switch: > Perhaps I am missing some edge cases, but I would have expected it to be > as "straightforward" as the current action with revisions. > If a commit on the inner WC created by an external occurs, but that WC has > switched to a different path, there is no value in offering to update the > version. > In fact, this can be potentially breaking, if the external URL has revs > newer than the previous peg... > > What I would (perhaps naievely) expect to occur, post commit (inner WC): > 1. Check WC path vs. svn:external property path > --> If different, offer user to change >
Define "if different" :) The external is definitely different, otherwise you wouldn't need an external. And how would you determine the exact change to the external needed? > 2. Check WC revision vs. svn:external property peg/operative revision > --> If different, offer user to change > This will always be different if the external comes from another repository. Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TortoiseSVN" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tortoisesvn+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tortoisesvn/a327de56-8ece-4cfb-94a7-3c716e8836d1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.