From: To:, Cc: " Subject: Email reply from ABC's 'Nightline' correspondent Sent: Friday, July 7, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: RE: Mr. Watt, why did your 'Nightline' broadcast leave out mention of Israel last night? Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:25:30 -0400 From: "Watt, Nick" To: "James Morris" Mr. Morris, Thank you for your time. I received your email and voice message. Yours, Nick Watt -----Original Message----- From: James Morris Sent: 07 July 2006 10:41 To: Watt, Nick Cc: Stejic, Dimitrije; tkoppel; Marenghi, Paolo Subject: Mr. Watt, why did your 'Nightline' broadcast leave out mention of Israel last night? Dear Mr. Watt, I saw your segment on ABC's 'Nightline' last night in the USA and would like to know why the '7/7' suicide bomber's mention of Israel was not included from his video broadcast on Al-Jazeera? One can see full mention of such via the articles at the following URL: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=55375 <javascript:ol('http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t%3d55375 ');> The following URL also conveyed that 'Nightline' has a pro-Israel bias: ABC Nightline Biased Toward Israel By Genevieve Cora Fraser 7-4-6 http://rense.com/general72/ABC.HTM <javascript:ol('http://rense.com/general72/ABC.HTM');> I also would like to know why 'Nightline' has not covered the excellent paper by professors John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) and Stephen Walt (Harvard University) on the pro-Israel lobby. Their paper initially appeared in the London Review of Books. Links for such are included with the 'Pro-Israel lobby under attack' UPI article that one can scroll down to at the following URL: http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=49800 <javascript:ol('http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t%3d49800 ');> Here is the link for the London Review of Books publication of the Mearsheimer/Walt paper: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html <javascript:ol('http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html');> You might be interested in the latest article by Seymour Hersh which discusses the coming attack on Iran (which will be for Israel as well just as Iraq was): LAST STAND The military's problem with the President's Iran policy: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact <javascript:ol('http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact ');> Seymour Hersh: Senior Pentagon Officials Challenging President Bush's Iran War Plans http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/1349230 <javascript:ol('http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid%3d06/07/06/134923 0');> You might be interested in my exchange about the primary motivation for tragic attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993 and on 9/11 via the following URLs: http://www.IRmep.org/jm.wmv <javascript:ol('http://www.irmep.org/jm.wmv');> The Gorilla in the Room is US Support for Israel http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/08/gorilla-in-room-is-us-suppor t-for.html <javascript:ol('http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/08/gorilla-in-r oom-is-us-support-for.html');> http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/09/no-other-motivation-no-other .html <javascript:ol('http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/09/no-other-mot ivation-no-other.html');> I was thanked by General Janis Karpinski (in the back of her book about Abu Ghraib and similar which was released last year) for conveying information to her about the JINSA/PNAC Neocon (war for Israel) agenda which has Iran in its sights next. I also conveyed information about the JINSA/PNAC Neocon agenda to former Brit MP (and Father of the Commons) Tam Dalyell which persuaded him to go public (initially in 'Vanity Fair' magazine) according to what he told me on the telephone (see the articles linked at the bottom of the following 'Democracy Now' debate which I helped arrange as well): http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/13/179248 <javascript:ol('http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid%3d03/05/13/179248 ');> Ted Koppel spiked an earlier 'Nightline' broadcast about the USS Liberty attack/cover-up (which included an interview with Captain Ward Boston) apparently because Mr. Koppel didn't like how unfavorably Israel would come across after Captain Boston's interview. I am the friend of Captain Boston (referenced in the following article from the San Diego Union Tribune newspaper) who had faxed his declaration to esteemed intelligence author/writer James Bamford (Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book discusses the JINSA/PNAC Neocon agenda behind the Iraq war): http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20040217-9999-1n17liberty.html <javascript:ol('http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20040217-9999-1n 17liberty.html');> The US State Department is yet to respond to the following email: Adam Ereli (the deputy spokesperson for the US State Department who makes regular appearances during the press conferences on C-SPAN) still has not answered the following email which was sent to him this past March (2005): Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:38:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: For Adam Ereli/US State Department To: [email protected] <http://by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?mailto=1&msg=8C990663 -282B-4317-BFEA-35438BBAC957&start=0&len=29852&src=&type=x&to=erel...@state. gov&cc=&bcc=&subject=&body=&curmbox=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001&a=d a85a55f8b749ee4e248fab511a046d7ec407196f55651ce8920c6f01aea7af4> Mr. Ereli, I had written to the US State Department last year and never received a reply as I had inquired as to when Mark Susser (with the Department of the Historian) will enter Captain Ward Boston's declaration (about the USS Liberty attack/cover-up) into the historical record. Captain Boston's declaration can be read at the following URL: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/ul-boston.html <javascript:ol('http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/ul-boston.html');> One can watch esteemed US intelligence writer James Bamford reading Captain Boston's declaration via the 'History in the Making: State Rules on the 1967 Arab-Israeli War' link near the bottom of www.irmep.org <javascript:ol('http://www.irmep.org/');> as the following article is from the San Diego Union Tribune: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20040217-9999-1n17liberty.html <javascript:ol('http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20040217-9999-1n 17liberty.html');> I assume that you know about James Bamford's latest book ('A Pretext for War') which conveys the 'A Clean Break: Strategy for Securing the Realm' (war for Israel) agenda of the Likudnik (JINSA/CSP/PNAC) Neoconservative cabal which pushed the USA to attack Iraq for Israel (one can read about such from pages 261-269 of 'A Pretext for War' via the following URL): 'A Clean Break' (from James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book): http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=28769 <javascript:ol('http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t%3d28769');> It is incredible how JINSA Zionist extremist operative John Bolton has been appointed as the next US Ambassador to the United Nations as the following URL conveys: JINSA Zionist Operative John Bolton Just Named as US Ambassador to UN: http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=30785 <javascript:ol('http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t%3d30785');> With kindest regards, James Morris James Morris wrote: PBS Frontline Documentary To Expose "The Dark Side" Of Cheney... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/20/pbs-frontline-docu_n_23433.html <javascript:ol('http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/20/pbs-frontline-docu_ n_23433.html');> World Oil Prices Could Triple If Bush Admin. Fails To Solve Iran Conflict... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/20/world-oil-prices-could-tr_n_23415.h tml <javascript:ol('http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/20/world-oil-prices-co uld-tr_n_23415.html');> Sam Brand wrote: From: Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, Washington, D.C. Re: Why are Zionist Agents Controlling the 9/11 Litigation and Preventing Every Single Case from Going to Trial? The 9/11 litigation process is being tightly controlled by a Zionist judge and lawyers working for firms very closely tied to the state of Israel. Why is that and is that proper? Here is the recent conversation of June 8, 2006 between Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein and the lawyers for the 9/11 plaintiffs. http://www.sept11tortlitigation.com/txt/june8_2006_transcript.txt <javascript:ol('http://www.sept11tortlitigation.com/txt/june8_2006_transcrip t.txt');> This conversation clearly shows the desire of Judge Hellerstein to settle all the 9/11 cases out of court through the special mediator - Sheila Birnbaum of Skadden Arps. For example see this exchange in paragraph 10: THE COURT: Why aren't you settling your cases? MR. MIGLIORI: We're working on it. THE COURT: You're not working hard enough. Ms. Birnbaum tells me she is getting no response from you. It should be noted that Skadden Arps is Israel's main law firm in the United States, and one of its partners, Kenneth J. Bialkin is the former national chairman of the ADL of B'nai Brith. See: http://www.skadden.com/index.cfm?contentID=45 <javascript:ol('http://www.skadden.com/index.cfm?contentID%3d45%26amp;bioID% 3d9');> &bioID=9 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/kenneth_bialkin.html <javascript:ol('http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/kennet h_bialkin.html');> Judge Hellerstein and his wife are also well known Zionists. See "The Zionist Hijacking of the 9/11 Victim Lawsuits": http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=87695 <javascript:ol('http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read%3d87695' );> This raises the obvious question as to why are Zionist agents and law firms so tightly controlling the 9/11 litigation in order to keep any 9/11 case from being heard in the U.S. court system in an open and public trial before the media and public? If Zacharias Moussaoui, a foreign national, is entitled to his day in a U.S. court, why are the relatives of the 9/11 victims not allowed to have their cases heard in a court before a jury? The Zionist agents controlling the 9/11 litigation in the Southern District Court of New York are doing their utmost to prevent any 9/11 case from going to trial because the last thing they want is for the truth of 9/11 to be brought out in a court. They are clearly protecting the lies of 9/11 and doing so on behalf of the state of Israel. What does this say about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11? *** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check <http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr> http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr for more real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) free book download: <http://www.lulu.com/content/165077> http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 *** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only. To be removed from the weekly list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "total_truth_sciences" group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
