But the scope itself seems fine. Builds clean, runs tests, sane
packaging, no critical bugs, bug subscriber.
Does need MIRs for source packages mediascanner2 and thumbnailer-service
(source thumbnailer) though.
** Changed in: unity-scope-mediascanner (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scope-mediascanner
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218409
Title:
[MIR] unity-scope-mediascanner
Status in unity-scope-mediascanner package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
Availability:
In universe: amd64, i386, armhf, powerpc
Rationale:
With the mediascanner available in main (MIR still in-progress), we would
like to get one of its main consumers into main as well. The mediascanner scope
has been written with being offered to the users by default, as part of the
default experience.
Dependencies:
- mediascanner -> MIR submitted LP: #1217287
Maintenance and quality assurance:
It is a Ubuntu upstream package, so we can assure proper maintainability and
quality assurance. There are a lot of unit testing run on build - one also
checks the bindings with mediascanner itself, so it's also testing mediascanner
correctness.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-mediascanner/+bug/1218409/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
