This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.99ubuntu2

---------------
unattended-upgrades (0.99ubuntu2) bionic; urgency=medium

  * Run upgrade-between-snapshots only on amd64.
    The test exercises only unattented-upgrade's Python code and uses
    dependencies from the frozen Debian snapshot archive thus running
    it on all architectures would provide little benefit.

 -- Balint Reczey <rbal...@ubuntu.com>  Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:41:20 +0700

** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577215

Title:
  Origin pattern is unexpected on dpkg-reconfigure

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  In testing out the new unattended-upgrades behaviour I was asked an
  unexpected question about the "unattended-upgrades Origin-Pattern".
  This is not a great experience, it doesn't match anything other than
  internal code patterns.

  For example, the default offered does NOT look like a sensible Ubuntu
  default for Ubuntu users:

    "origin=Debian,codename=${distro_codename},label=Debian-
  Security";___

  Is that correct, or a mistake?

  What I would expect is simply this:

   Install security updates (Y/N)
   Install performance and reliability updates (Y/N)
   Install updates from unofficial archives (Y/N)

  The latter would map to all PPAs etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1577215/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to