JJZolx;459163 Wrote: 
> I wasn't really trying to be funny.  I think the Squeezebox Touch is a
> very poor choice for such an application.  There's now a 64GB iPod Touch
> available (for about the same price as an SB Touch and external hard
> drive) and for just $249 the 160GB iPod Classic can store more than 2000
> albums in high quality MP3.  There's just no compelling reason to kludge
> together some kind of Squeezebox setup in your car.
> 
> What really gets me shaking my head are the people speculating about
> how they'll be able to use the Squeezebox Touch with its internal server
> and an external hard drive as a portable system.  Essentially it just
> gives you a gigantic multi-piece iPod that is bound to an electrical
> socket.

Why not?  I've been using a Squeezebox in my car for several years now.
It works great.  I agree it is a bit of a kluge but it's awesome to
have 4000 albums available whenever I want to listen to them and all
play back with uncompressed audio.


-- 
dsclar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
dsclar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33404
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=68009

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to