mortslim;521454 Wrote: > Here is a criticism of RR HRx releases by the owner of a competing > record label: > > There are several companies that are distributing their tracks on > DVD-R discs because the files are so large that making downloads out of > them is impractical. I have analyzed a number of these files as well and > am sorry to say that there is nothing above 35 kHz in any of them. Why > bother with 176.4 samples per second when the resultant audio doesn't > take advantage of the higher sample rate? It's true that higher sample > rates also contribute to easier filtering in the D to A process. But why > wouldn't the HF material that is produced by the instruments show up in > these tracks? You'll have to decide for yourself the motivations of > these other labels. > > http://www.itrax.com/Pages/ArticleDetails.php?aID=21&x=7&y=4
I'm a bit tired of these "you don't need it 'couse you don't hear any difference, otherwise there are no HR-records" type posts. Please don't want to persuade me that I don't need it!! Please!!!! -- temerini ------------------------------------------------------------------------ temerini's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35877 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74688
_______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
