On 06/07/2010 12:03 AM, JohnSwenson wrote: > The most obvious upgrade is an increase in memory. Doubling the memory > size would be a very simple design change and could probably be done > "on the fly" without changing anything else or any software. New ones > after a certain date could just have twice the memory.
Which would be "good" but it would not stop all the whining about TinySC, it would still be tiny, just maybe a bit bigger. There would still be practical limits on the size of libraries, plug-in support, etc. > At this point there has been no hint that Logitech is even thinking > about new hardware. The product has been on the market for a few months. I can't think of any reason that management, at Logitech or anyplace else, would pour a bunch of money to developing a replacement for a new product with zero guarantee that the improvements would result in the massive sales growth to pay for the engineering. I find speculation of a replacement ungrounded. Replacing the Boom with a Touch-based heart, may make sense. I'm not holding my breath. Whether Crutchfield carries the Touch or not is a silly topic, there have been only a tiny few facts and a ton of speculation onto the cause, meaning and implications of something that may or may not have happened. This thread is not worth the electrons spent spreading its content. IMHO. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
