On 07/24/2010 08:30 AM, Henry66 wrote: > What about the suckers... sorry I mean consumers, who bought the SACDs? > Were they told that what they were buying were just ultra-expensive > CDs?
You do mean expensive, heavily copy protected things that contained the same content as CDs? Nope, Sony claimed that DSD was better. In and of itself. Its not a bad archival format. But it never was really an audiophile format, Even at best,there is wicked noise shapeing to move any 20kHz-40kHz noise out of hearing. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
