mlsstl;576615 Wrote: > I'm not sure I understand why the Touch ended up a "class D" component. > The issue has come up in a couple of forums and it seems there is some > avoidance regarding an explanation. > > The Transporter got an "A" rating. Having used both in my home system I > find the difference between the two relatively small even without taking > the price difference into account. I would have thought a "class B" or > at least a "C" rating would have been appropriate. > > Is the Touch just too cheap and small to rate higher? It seems an issue > worth discussing.
The Transporter LOOKS like an expensive audio component and COSTS like one. The Touch looks like a kid's video game and costs less than the cable that connects it to the amp. If they sounded alike, Stereophile would have to close shop and go home. So they can't sound alike. -- Pale Blue Ego ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81346 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
