Kal Rubinson;580716 Wrote: 
> The rating appeared in the same issue as the full review, so it is
> reasonable to expect that readers would see both.  In fact, even
> scanners should see the reference to the review in the RC listings.
> 
> This is what JA has to say about the rating:
> 
> "The rating I decide on for a product when I receive feedback from
> the review team is based on its unmodified performance in its
> fundamental role. That is can be made to sound better with, for
> exmaple, an upgraded power supply, or a modification to its firmware,
> or by using, as you have done an expensive outbard DAC is not something
> I take into account. (Though these things are mentioned in  the review
> and will be mentioned in the accompnaying blurb in the next
> "Recommended Components" listing.) Note that the entry for the Touch in
> "Recommended Components" specifically said "see KR's review in this
> issue.""

I guess the cynic was right after all.


-- 
ralphpnj

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter ->
Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch

'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81346

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to