Wolfsong;626952 Wrote: > Aubuti, > > Thanks for the reply. Now I am getting my head spun around. The > Router has to be capable of better "performance" even if the SBS is > stored on a NAS? Man I had no idea! I was under the impression that > using a normal NAS connected via ethernet meant the SBS could be > installed on the NAS and not on the router or a pc that runs all the > time. As RAD_Abz deduced, I thought you were referring to the NAS function of the Netgear router, as that is most of what you talked about in your first post. Or at least it seemed that way to me.
I ran SBS on a couple different LinkStation NASs for a couple years, but now I would strongly recommend a small headless pc instead, ideally something with an Atom CPU. -- aubuti ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87197 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
