eiffel wrote: > I suggest keeping the list simple and focused on objective factors. > > It should concentrated on > - whether the USB input of the dac is compatible with EDO > - what, if any, special procedure is required for compatibility > - Is a USB2 hub required, and if so, from which sampling rate > - up to what frequency is the USB input working > - what quircks exist, if any > > One could arguably add some statements about whether users prefered the > USB to the SPDIF input (this includes a degree of subjectivity) > > The google doc spreadsheet meets most of the above points
Good summary ! keep it that way ! I concur that the subjective columns is arguable imo don't include it unless properly blind tested ,but as anyone can just make it up so just don't include. You can evaluate stuff by pure subjective means given that you take care of all biases ,but frankly no one of us do that very often as it is a hobby and it takes some effort to do. (somewhere buried on this forum are claims that very poor not async usb inputs sounds fantastic :) on some dacs ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94512 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
