garym wrote: 
> My position is that unless something is wrong with one's system, there
> should be NO audible difference between the two methods. (yes, I've
> tried it both ways back when this sort of discussion began)

I've been in the recording biz since 1971, having worked in all areas of
it in Hollywood, Burbank, etc.  In the 'pro industry', there is now talk
of hard-drives actually changing the sound of digitally recorded audio,
and it has to do with jitter that is acquired because of buffering in
the drive.  There's lots of testing going on about this, but it IS
possible that differences can be heard, not necessarily BETTER, but
different, all relating to differing jitter during playback.



Eric Seaberg - San Diego
-A.E.S., S.M.P.T.E., S.P.A.R.S.-
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Seaberg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7896
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102917

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to